Beauty Works

Toxic Beauty - Whats in your beauty products

Filed under: Beauty Products, Beauty Tips, Worse Beauty Products — Beauty July 2, 2008 @ 1:02 am


cosmetic-ingredients.png

Web site warns of toxins in beauty products

 

When you wash your hair or put on makeup, are you getting a dangerous dose of toxic chemicals in the process?

 

Safety advocates are sounding the alarm about the potential health risks in thousands of cosmetic ingredients.

 

Biologist Renee sharp says reading labels is worthless if you don’t know what they mean.

 

Sharp is senior analyst for the Environmental Working Group, a cosmetic safety advocate in Washington, D.C.

 

Sharp says studies show as many half the personal care products on the market have at least one chemical linked to either reproductive problems or cancer.

 

“We’re basically conducting a giant chemical experiment on ourselves.” she said.

 

Sharp points to parabens as one example. Parabens are widely used as preservatives. Names you’ll likely see on ingredient labels are ethylparaben, propylparaben and methylparaben.

 

Published studies have linked parabens to breast tumors in women, and possible disruption of reproductive hormones in young males.

 

Many nail polishes contain the controversial chemicals called phthalates. The industry insists phthalates are safe in the amounts currently used in consumer products. Health advocates say tests associate phthalates with abnormal reproductive hormone development.

 

Health advocates are further concerned that federal regulators do virtually no cosmetic testing.

 

Of the more than 350 pages of the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Acts, there are only one and a half pages addressing cosmetics, and those sections deal with adulteration and misbranding.

 

Safety testing for cosmetics is left to manufacturers. The FDA is only involved when a cosmetic product also contains a drug.

 

So the Environmental Working Group launched a cosmetic safety database called Skin Deep.

 

Sharp says the database is a compilation of more than 10,000 ingredients and more than 30,000 products, matched against 50 toxicity and regulatory databases from around the world.

 

Type in the product or ingredient and you’ll get ingredient descriptions, potential concerns, and a color coded hazard score: green for low hazard, yellow for moderate hazard and red if the hazard is considered high.

 

The oxybenzone in Cathy Matson’s skin cream prevents sun damage, but also raises concern about potential problems with reproduction development.

 

Oxybenzone is the active ingredient in many sunscreen products, even sunscreens made for babies. Oxybenzone got a Skin Deep ranking of 7.

 

“That’s scary,” said Matson. “That’s terrifying. That’s something that’s supposed to be good for my skin.”

 

Seattle pediatrician Sheela Sathyanarayana says some health trends clearly raise questions about possible environmental factors.

 

“There’s more breast cancer in women than there used to be. There’s more testicular cancer in men,” she said.

 

But are the chemicals the cause?

 

“We have a lot of animal studies, but we don’t have a lot of human studies,” said Sathyanarayana, who is also a researcher at the University of Washington Department of Pediatric Environmental Health.

 

Sathyanarayana’s own recent studies confirm higher phthalate concentrations in the urine of infants who were exposed to baby care products with phthalates.

 

“And it’s more that cumulative exposure to all of these chemicals that may be potentially causing a health effect,” said Sathyanarayana.

 

The doctor’s prescription? Minimize all chemical exposure to infants and young children. Women of reproductive age or women who are pregnant should minimize their exposure, too.

 

For everyone else, beware of what’s in the products you’re using so you can make an informed choice.

 

The Personal Care Products Council represents the cosmetic and personal care industry. PCPC insists the products we use are safe, saying a lot of information on the Internet is inaccurate and misleading.

 

The industry has launched its own cosmetics database with the industry’s explanation of cosmetic ingredients and the industry’s efforts to insure consumer safety.

Full Article

The Worst Health and Beauty Products

Filed under: Worse Beauty Products — Beauty March 5, 2008 @ 5:50 am

The Worst Health and Beauty Products

Save your money on these wallet-drainers

la-mer.png

 

As a society, there’s no doubt that we’re obsessed with looking good. And because nature abhors a vacuum, cosmetics companies are only too happy to rush in and fill any void by offering an astonishing array of health and beauty products that promise to erase wrinkles and take years off our appearance. Unfortunately, the only thing many are good at erasing is the money from our wallets.


TheImproper.com takes a closer look at which products you need to delete from your must-have list. Some of the results may surprise you.


Wild, Wild West


One thing many consumer-products companies won’t tell you is that they’re free to make all kinds of unbelievable claims about their products. Why? Because those claims are not regulated by the Food and Drug Administration or any other governing body that forces them to be honest in their advertising. And because so much money is on the line in the $200 billion cosmetics industry, consumer products companies make all kinds of astonishing claims to get us to buy their lotions and creams. Here are a few overpriced products that just don’t live up to their hype.


Crème de la Mer


As we discussed previously, Crème de la Mer is one of our top rants when it comes to overpriced, overhyped products that simply does not deliver results. But the marketing machine behind Crème de la Mer is so massive that there’s almost no stopping their huge worldwide sales.

At $200 per 2-oz. jar, it better do more than just moisturize my skin. But, in fact, it’s not any more effective than Vaseline, one of the cheapest moisturizers around. Indeed, Crème de la Mer is actually 44% Vaseline, so maybe that’s why the heavy consistency of the cream is so astonishingly similar to the all-purpose generic petroleum jelly.

On its website, Crème de la Mer actually concedes it has no idea how its lotion actually works: “It is not entirely clear how Crème de la Mer works. But certainly the proof can be seen on the faces of those who use it. In a short time, skin becomes softer, firmer, looks virtually creaseless.”

Frankly, if a miracle cream can’t even explain how it works but then has the nerve to charge $200 for a 2-oz jar, I’ll just keep on walking. I’ve tried this moisturizer, and that’s all it is: a thick moisturizer that feels like spackle and is heavily perfumed. I didn’t notice any difference in my skin even after using the entire jar, and I’m not the only one. Of 1,094 users who reviewed Crème de la Mer on popular beauty portal Makeupalley.com, only 56% said they would repurchase it. So there you have it.

Lip Plumpers

These days, bee-stung lips like the kind Angelina Jolie has are all the rage. In fact, plastic surgeons say Angelina’s lips are the No#1 requested lips sought by women. That’s not surprising, since Angelina does have incredible facial features. So where there’s a demand, cosmetics companies are only too happy to supply products that capitalize on them.

Unfortunately, when it comes to lip plumpers, none of them actually work. Whether you buy the cheaper drugstore brands or the high-end brands only available at dermatologists’ offices, the most they do is provide a high gloss (and when you make anything shiny or glossy, it tends to appear slightly bigger).

Patricia Wexler MD Dermatology’s No-Injection Lip Plumper is a prime example. Like all overpriced cosmetics, Wexler’s lip plumper, which is sold for $18, is beautifully packaged. In fact, the reason why you pay so much for name-brand cosmetics is because the manufacturer spends so much money on pretty packaging and expensive marketing campaigns. Oftentimes the ingredients used in the so-called high-end cosmetics are almost identical to less-expensive brands. Wexler’s lip plumper gave my lips a very glossy look but did nothing to plump them up. Most lip plumpers irritate the skin on your lips, which sometimes can temporarily plump them up.

But the swelling is always temporary and never makes a noticeable difference in the size of your lips. A much cheaper alternative is to brush cinnamon oil on your lips; it’ll irritate your lips the same way name-brand lip plumpers are supposed to and will have the same effect. In fact, cinnamon oil is a key ingredient in many popular lip plumpers. The only real way to get bigger lips is to get injected with fillers at a plastic surgeon or dermatologist’s office. Otherwise, you’re just paying for glorified lip gloss.

Tony Little’s Gazelle Glider

Just like cosmetics companies, many exercise-equipment manufacturers make all kinds of ridiculous weight-loss claims. One of the stupidest and least effective exercise equipment on the market today is Tony Little’s Gazelle exercise glider. Surprisingly, stumpy exercise guru Tony Little has made a fortune on these over the past few years. While it’s reasonably priced for an exercise equipment (at about $100), the Gazelle just doesn’t deliver on its promise to provide an effective aerobic workout.

A couple of years ago, when I injured my ankle, I actually ordered this. I only used it twice before it got thrown out (I didn’t even want to give it away since it’s so ineffective). First, the swinging leg motion on the apparatus is so boring and monotonous that I don’t think anyone could withstand using this for more than a couple of minutes. It’s seriously boring.

Second, and more importantly, it failed to get my heart rate up at all, so it really doesn’t qualify as an aerobic workout. The motion is so low-impact from an aerobic standout, I don’t see how anyone could get any kind of real exercise from this. Perhaps the Gazelle might work for morbidly obese people or older, sedentary individuals, but for the average person in reasonable shape, it won’t have any impact whatsoever. So save your money, no matter how clever the hype.

Abdominal Machines

The exercise-equipment market is flooded with electronic and manual abdominal machines that promise chiseled six-packs. Products with flashy names like Ab Roller, Fast Abs, Ab Tronic and Ab Energizer promise you’ll achieve a flat stomach in no time with no sweat. Unfortunately, none of them actually work.

Fitness professionals have repeatedly stated that the only way to lose flab in your stomach is to lose overall body weight. This notion of “spot exercisers” that target a specific area on your body is a sham, experts say. But no matter how often and how loudly fitness experts send this message, ab machines continue to flood the market. The only effective way to burn off those stubborn pockets of fat in your midsection is to cut calories and do cardio workouts combined with a well-rounded weight-training program. You can use those flashy ab rollers every single day for an hour, but without making adjustments to your diet or exercise routine, you won’t see any results. Period.

Use Common Sense

Some of the claims made by these consumer products companies defy logic and set off your BS detector. In these instances, listen to your inner voice: If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Cosmetics companies prey on our insecurities in order to sell their products. In fact, the more inadequate they make us feel, the more money they’ll make from us.

So keep this in mind the next time you get mesmerized by a hot new “must-have” miracle cream or exercise equipment. You’ll pay a steep price for leaving your common sense at home the next time you go shopping.

Full Article